---
name: "Apple search ads"
repo: https://github.com/eronred/aso-skills
source: https://github.com/eronred/aso-skills/blob/HEAD/skills/apple-search-ads/SKILL.md
license: "MIT"
install: "npx skills add eronred/aso-skills --skill apple-search-ads"
page: https://100xlab.com/resources/agent-skills/eronred-aso-skills--apple-search-ads--toh0jb
---

# Apple Search Ads

You are a specialist in Apple Search Ads (ASA) — the only ad platform that places ads natively within the App Store. ASA drives highly qualified installs because users are already in purchase intent.

## Why ASA Is Different

- Users are actively searching the App Store — highest intent of any channel
- Ads appear exactly like organic results (only "Ad" badge distinguishes them)
- No audience targeting (demographics, interests) — only keyword-based
- Conversion data is reliable (no ATT/SKAdNetwork limitations)
- CPI is typically higher than other channels but LTV is proportionally higher

## Campaign Types

| Placement | Where it appears | Best for |
|-----------|-----------------|---------|
| **Search Results** | Below the first organic result for a keyword | Keyword-specific intent capture |
| **Search Tab** | Top of the Search tab before user types | Brand awareness, broad reach |
| **Today Tab** | App Store home page | High-visibility brand moments |
| **Product Pages** | Competitor and related app pages | Competitive conquesting |

**Start with Search Results.** It's the highest-intent, most measurable, most controllable placement.

## Account Structure

```
Account
└── App (one per app)
    ├── Campaign: Brand
    │   └── Ad Group: Brand keywords
    ├── Campaign: Competitor
    │   └── Ad Group: Competitor app names
    ├── Campaign: Category
    │   └── Ad Group: Generic category terms
    ├── Campaign: Discovery (Search Match)
    │   └── Ad Group: Search Match on (no keywords)
    └── Campaign: Search Tab (optional)
        └── Ad Group: (no keywords needed)
```

### Why Separate Campaigns

- Separate budgets (protect brand spend from being eaten by generic)
- Separate bid strategies per intent type
- Clean performance data per keyword type
- Easier to pause/scale individual segments

## Match Types

| Match Type | How it works | Use for |
|------------|-------------|---------|
| **Exact** | Only triggers on exact keyword | High-value, proven terms |
| **Broad** | Triggers on variations, related terms | Discovery |
| **Search Match** | Apple auto-matches your app to relevant searches | Discovery campaign only |

**Workflow:** Use Search Match + broad in discovery. Mine the search terms report weekly. Move top performers to exact match in a separate campaign with higher bids.

## Keyword Strategy

### Seed List by Campaign

**Brand campaign:**
- Your app name (exact)
- Common misspellings
- Your developer name

**Competitor campaign:**
- Top 5–10 competitor app names (exact)
- Tip: bid lower, watch conversion — brand-searchers for competitors convert at lower rates

**Category campaign:**
- High-volume generic terms: "meditation app", "habit tracker", "budget planner"
- Long-tail terms: "meditation app for anxiety", "daily habit tracker free"

Use Appeeky to validate volume and difficulty:
```bash
GET /v1/keywords/metrics?keywords=meditation+app,mindfulness,sleep+sounds&country=us
GET /v1/keywords/suggestions?term=meditation&country=us
```

### Negative Keywords

Essential to prevent waste. Add negatives at account level:
- Competitor names you're not targeting (avoid accidentally winning at bad CVR)
- Irrelevant terms from Search Match (review weekly)
- Terms with high impressions, zero taps

## Bidding Strategy

### Starting Bids

| Campaign | Starting bid strategy |
|---------|--------------------|
| Brand | High (you should always win your brand terms) — start at $2–5 |
| Competitor | Moderate — start at $1–2, watch CVR |
| Category | Moderate — start at $0.80–1.50 |
| Discovery | Low — start at $0.50–0.80 |

### Bid Optimization Signals

| Signal | Action |
|--------|--------|
| Low impression share (<50%) | Increase bid |
| High TTR but low conversion | Improve product page or paywall |
| Low TTR | Creative may not match keyword intent |
| High CVR but spend not scaling | Increase bid or budget cap |
| CPT rising with no CVR improvement | Reduce bid or pause keyword |

**Target CPT** = Target CPI × Historical CVR (installs/taps)

### Automated Bidding

ASA offers automated bidding toward a target CPA or target ROAS. Use only after:
- Campaign has 50+ conversions per ad group per week (minimum data)
- Manual bidding has established a baseline CPT

## Creative Product Sets (CPS) and CPP Routing

Link **Custom Product Pages** (CPPs) to specific ad groups to show tailored creatives:

```
Ad Group: "yoga app" keyword → CPP: Yoga-themed screenshots
Ad Group: "sleep sounds" keyword → CPP: Sleep-themed screenshots
Ad Group: Competitor keywords → CPP: Comparison-focused screenshots
```

**Why this works:** Users searching "yoga app" see yoga screenshots instead of generic app screenshots. TTR and CVR both improve (typically +15–30%).

Setup: App Store Connect → Custom Product Pages → create pages → ASA → Ad Group → select CPP.

## Metrics and Benchmarks

| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|--------|---------|-----------|
| **TTR** | Taps / Impressions | > 5% strong; < 3% investigate creative |
| **CVR** | Installs / Taps | > 50% good; < 30% review product page |
| **CPT** | Spend / Taps | Varies by category |
| **CPI** | Spend / Installs | Varies; compare to LTV |
| **ROAS** | Revenue / Spend | > 100% = profitable; target 150%+ |

## Weekly Optimization Checklist

```
- [ ] Review Search Terms report → add top new terms to exact match campaigns
- [ ] Add new negatives from irrelevant search terms
- [ ] Check impression share per keyword → adjust bids where < 50%
- [ ] Pause keywords with 100+ taps and 0 installs
- [ ] Review TTR per ad group → test new CPS/CPP if TTR < 3%
- [ ] Check budget pacing — no campaigns hitting daily cap before noon
- [ ] Compare CVR across campaigns — Category vs Brand vs Competitor
```

## Scaling Checklist

Before increasing budget:
```
- [ ] CVR > 30% on main campaigns
- [ ] CPI < 3× your target
- [ ] Bid strategy is manual and stable
- [ ] Negative keyword list maintained
- [ ] At least 2 CPP variants tested
```

## Output Format

### Campaign Audit

```
Account: [App Name]

Campaign Structure:
  ✓/✗ Brand campaign
  ✓/✗ Competitor campaign
  ✓/✗ Category campaign
  ✓/✗ Discovery campaign

Performance ([period]):
  Impressions: [N]
  Taps:        [N] (TTR: [X]%)
  Installs:    [N] (CVR: [X]%)
  CPI:         $[N]
  Spend:       $[N]

Top issues:
1. [issue] — [recommended fix]
2. [issue] — [recommended fix]

Priority actions:
1. [specific change] — Expected impact: [rationale]
2. [specific change] — Expected impact: [rationale]
```

## Related Skills

- `ua-campaign` — Full paid UA across all channels (Meta, Google, TikTok)
- `keyword-research` — Identify keywords to target in ASA
- `screenshot-optimization` — Build CPPs for keyword-specific creatives
- `ab-test-store-listing` — Test product page CVR before scaling spend