AGENT SKILLBY MANOJBAJAJ95
Lead generation & demand
AT A GLANCE
Lead generation & demand is an agent skill for go-to-market. Comprehensive B2B demand generation and lead acquisition skill. The manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin repository on GitHub, maintained by manojbajaj95, has 67 stars and the MIT license. To add it, run npx skills add manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill lead-generation-and-demand
- SOURCE REPOSITORY
- manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin (opens GitHub in a new tab)
- REPO STARS
- SOURCE REPOSITORY
- LICENSE
- MIT
- CATEGORIES
- SKILL.MD SIZE
- 41.4 KB1,329 LINES
QUICK ANSWER
- WHAT IT IS01
- Comprehensive B2B demand generation and lead acquisition skill. Use when building lead generation systems, creating demand acquisition campaigns, optimizing CAC, designing lead magnets, conducting lead research, or. Its edge is a particular angle on paid media, giving the agent tighter constraints than a plain lead generation & demand request.
- INPUTS02
- Context for paid media: your goals, audience, constraints, and any source material the skill asks for.
- OUTPUT03
- A ready-to-use result for paid media: the analysis, copy, or recommendations the agent produces.
INSTALL
One command adds this skill from its source repository.
npx skills add manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill lead-generation-and-demandREAD THE SKILL.MD BELOW BEFORE YOU RUN IT. SKILLS INSTRUCT YOUR AGENT.
SKILL.MD
The full file, as published in the source repository. Copy it, download it or open it on GitHub.
ON THIS PAGE · 80
Lead Generation & Demand#
Workspace Context#
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract#
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Comprehensive demand generation playbook for B2B SaaS companies focused on pipeline creation, CAC optimization, and multi-channel lead acquisition.
Quick Start#
- Define ICP — Identify ideal customer profile (firmographics, psychographics, technographics)
- Map Funnel — TOFU → MOFU → BOFU stages with clear goals
- Select Channels — Prioritize by CAC, lead quality, and timeline
- Create Assets — Lead magnets, landing pages, nurturing sequences
- Launch & Optimize — Track, measure, iterate continuously
ICP Framework#
Firmographics#
| Element | Question | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | What sector? | B2B SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare |
| Company Size | Employee count? | 50-500 employees |
| Revenue | Annual revenue? | $5M-$50M ARR |
| Geography | Where? | US, UK, EU |
Psychographics#
- Values: What matters to them?
- Pain Points: What keeps them up at night?
- Goals: What are they trying to achieve?
Technographics#
- Current tools and stack
- Technology gaps
- Integration needs
Full-Funnel Strategy#
Funnel Stages#
| Stage | Goal | Content | Channels | Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOFU (Awareness) | Attract visitors | Blog, guides, calculators | SEO, social, content | Traffic, new visitors |
| MOFU (Consideration) | Capture leads | Whitepapers, webinars, case studies | Email, retargeting, gated content | Leads, MQLs |
| BOFU (Decision) | Convert opportunities | Demos, consultations, proposals | Sales outreach, direct | SQLs, opportunities |
Channel Strategy Matrix#
Channel Performance (B2B SaaS)#
| Channel | CAC Range | Lead Quality | Timeline | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO/Content | $50-150 | High | 6-12 months | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| LinkedIn Ads | $150-400 | High | Immediate | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Google Search | $80-250 | Very High | Immediate | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Webinars | $100-200 | High | 2-4 weeks | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Email Nurture | $20-50 | Medium-High | Ongoing | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Referrals | $0-50 | Very High | Variable | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Budget Allocation ($30-50k/month)#
| Channel | Budget | Expected MQLs | Expected SQLs |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15k | 50 | 10 | |
| Google Search | $12k | 80 | 20 |
| Google Display | $5k | 120 | 5 |
| Meta | $5k | 100 | 8 |
| Partnerships | $3k | 20 | 5 |
Lead Magnets#
High-Converting Formats#
| Type | Conversion Rate | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive Calculator | 15-30% | Technical evaluation |
| Technical Guide/Whitepaper | 10-20% | Education |
| Case Study (detailed) | 8-15% | Social proof |
| Webinar Registration | 20-40% | Engagement |
| Free Assessment | 25-40% | Qualification |
| Code Repository | 10-25% | Developer trust |
Lead Magnet Hooks#
- Quick Win — "The 5-Minute Audit"
- Forbidden Knowledge — "Secrets agencies don't want you to know"
- Shortcut — "30-Day Framework Instead of 90 Days"
- Social Proof — "How 500+ Founders Achieved X"
- Diagnosis — "Discover Your Blind Spots"
Landing Page Framework#
High-Converting Structure#
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEADLINE (Clear value proposition) │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUBHEADLINE (Supporting benefit) │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ HERO IMAGE/VIDEO │ FORM │
│ Visual proof │ Name, Email │
│ │ Company │
│ │ [CTA Button] │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SOCIAL PROOF (Logos, testimonials) │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ BENEFITS (3-5 key benefits) │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SECONDARY CTA │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘Conversion Checklist#
- Single, clear CTA
- Minimal form fields (3-5 max)
- Above-the-fold value proposition
- Social proof visible
- Mobile optimized
- Fast load time (<3s)
- No navigation distractions
Lead Scoring Model#
Scoring Criteria#
| Category | Criteria | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | Target industry | +20 |
| Company size 50-5000 | +15 | |
| Decision maker title | +25 | |
| Target geography | +10 | |
| Engagement | Downloaded lead magnet | +10 |
| Attended webinar | +20 | |
| Visited pricing page | +15 | |
| Multiple site visits | +5 each | |
| Email engagement | +5 per click | |
| Negative | Student/academic | -30 |
| Competitor | -50 | |
| Unsubscribed | -20 |
Lead Classification#
| Score | Classification | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80+ | SQL | Sales outreach |
| 50-79 | MQL | Nurture + sales alert |
| 20-49 | Engaged Lead | Continue nurturing |
| <20 | Cold Lead | Long-term nurture |
Email Nurture Sequences#
Welcome Sequence (New Leads)#
| Timing | Goal | |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Welcome | Immediate | Deliver content, set expectations |
| 2: Value Add | Day 2 | Related helpful content |
| 3: Social Proof | Day 4 | Case study highlight |
| 4: Education | Day 7 | Technical insight |
| 5: Soft Offer | Day 10 | Introduce services |
Metrics Targets#
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Open Rate | >25% |
| Click Rate | >3% |
| Unsubscribe | <0.5% |
CAC Optimization#
CAC Calculation#
CAC = Total Marketing & Sales Costs / Number of New CustomersBenchmarks (B2B SaaS)#
| Company Stage | Target CAC | LTV:CAC Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Early | $500-2000 | >3:1 |
| Growth | $300-1000 | >4:1 |
| Scale | $200-500 | >5:1 |
Reduction Strategies#
- Improve conversion rates — Better landing pages, forms
- Increase organic traffic — SEO, content marketing
- Referral programs — Leverage satisfied customers
- Lead scoring — Focus sales on high-intent leads
- Marketing automation — Scale without headcount
Attribution Modeling#
Multi-Touch Attribution#
| Model | First Touch | Middle | Last Touch |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Touch | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Last Touch | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Linear | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Recommended (U-Shape) | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| Recommended (W-Shape) | 40% | 20% | 40% |
UTM Structure#
utm_source={channel}
utm_medium={cpc|email|organic}
utm_campaign={id}
utm_content={variant}
utm_term={keywords}Lead Research Framework#
Research Process#
- Analyze Product/Service — Understand value proposition
- Define ICP — Industry, size, location, pain points
- Find Companies for matching — Search companies
- Prioritize — Score by fit (1-10)
- Research Contacts — Identify decision makers
Output Format#
For each lead provide:
- Company name and website
- Why they're a good fit (2-3 specific reasons)
- Priority score (1-10 with explanation)
- Target decision maker role
- Personalized outreach strategy
Paid Media Playbook#
LinkedIn Ads#
Campaign structure: Awareness → Consideration → Conversion Targeting: Company size 50-5,000, Director+ titles, SaaS/Tech Creative: Thought leadership, social proof, problem-solution
Google Ads#
Priority: Brand → Competitor → Solution → Problem → Display Bid strategy: Manual CPC → Target CPA at 50+ conversions Ad copy: 15 headlines covering value props, features, CTAs
Account-Based Sales (ABS)#
When to Use ABS#
| Criteria | Threshold |
|---|---|
| ACV | >$25K |
| TAM | <5,000 accounts |
| Buying committee | 3+ stakeholders |
| Sales cycle | >60 days |
ABS Framework#
| Element | Execution |
|---|---|
| Target list | 50-200 named accounts, tiered |
| Account research | 30 min per Tier 1 account |
| Multi-threading | 3-5 contacts per account |
| Custom content | Pain-specific messaging |
| Orchestration | Coordinated email + LinkedIn + ads |
Best Practices#
Do#
- Start with ICP definition
- Focus on fewer, higher-quality channels
- Create valuable lead magnets
- Nurture before selling
- Track attribution carefully
- Continuously optimize conversion
Don't#
- Buy email lists
- Spam cold prospects
- Gate all content
- Ignore lead quality for quantity
- Skip the nurture stage
- Neglect existing leads
Error Handling#
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Low conversion rate | Poor offer/targeting | Test new lead magnets, refine ICP |
| High CAC | Inefficient channels | Shift budget to performing channels |
| Low lead quality | Too broad targeting | Tighten ICP, add qualification |
| Email deliverability | List hygiene issues | Clean list, warm up domain |
Metrics Dashboard#
Weekly#
- New leads by source
- Conversion rates by channel
- Email performance
- Lead score distribution
Monthly#
- MQL → SQL conversion
- CAC by channel
- Attribution analysis
- Funnel velocity
Related Skills#
- conversion-rate-optimization (opens in a new tab) - CRO frameworks
- growth-strategy (opens in a new tab) - Growth loops and channels
- outbound-email-strategy (opens in a new tab) - Cold outreach
- sales-and-revenue-operations (opens in a new tab) - Sales processes
Supporting file: skills/conversion-rate-optimization/SKILL.md#
Conversion Rate Optimization#
Workspace Context#
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract#
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
You are a conversion rate optimization specialist for marketing pages and lead-capture forms. Your one job is to diagnose why a page or form is not converting and produce prioritized recommendations or test hypotheses. Keep product onboarding, paywalls, lifecycle retention, and pricing strategy in their dedicated skills.
Scope#
Use this skill for:
- Homepage, landing page, pricing page, feature page, blog CTA, webinar registration page, or campaign page conversion reviews
- Lead capture, contact, demo request, newsletter signup, or checkout-intent form optimization
- CTA hierarchy, value proposition clarity, friction, social proof, objection handling, and trust signals
- CRO experiment ideas that can be handed to
ab-test-setup
Route elsewhere:
| Request | Use Instead |
|---|---|
| Signup or activation inside the product | user-onboarding |
| Lifecycle emails or re-engagement | marketing-automation |
| Pricing, packaging, paywalls, upgrade screens | pricing-strategy |
| Analytics instrumentation or funnel measurement | data-and-funnel-analytics |
| Running a statistically valid experiment | ab-test-setup |
| Writing a full copy rewrite | copywriting-core |
Initial Assessment#
Ask only for missing inputs after reading bootstrap context:
- Page or form URL, screenshot, copy, or description
- Primary conversion goal
- Traffic source and visitor intent
- Current conversion rate and target, if known
- Known research: analytics, heatmaps, recordings, surveys, sales objections, or support tickets
CRO Analysis Framework#
Analyze in this order:
- Value proposition clarity: can a visitor understand what this is, who it is for, and why it matters within five seconds?
- Message match: does the page match the traffic source, search intent, ad promise, or referral context?
- CTA hierarchy: is there one clear primary action with value-oriented copy and repeated placement at decision points?
- Proof and trust: are claims supported by testimonials, logos, security signals, case studies, numbers, or concrete examples?
- Objection handling: are price, risk, implementation, fit, time-to-value, and credibility concerns answered before the CTA?
- Friction: are forms too long, fields unclear, steps surprising, mobile UX broken, or next steps ambiguous?
- Scannability: can a skim reader understand the argument from headings, captions, bullets, visuals, and CTAs?
Form Optimization#
- Every field has a cost; remove, defer, or make optional anything that is not immediately needed.
- Put value and reassurance directly above the form.
- Use inline validation, clear errors, mobile-appropriate keyboards, and explicit privacy expectations.
- For multi-step forms, start with easy questions, show progress, allow back navigation, and explain why sensitive fields are needed.
Output Format#
Return:
Diagnosis#
- Page type:
- Primary conversion goal:
- Biggest conversion constraint:
Quick Wins#
Low-effort fixes likely to improve clarity or reduce friction immediately.
High-Impact Changes#
Bigger changes that need design, copy, or engineering work.
Test Ideas#
Hypotheses formatted for ab-test-setup: "If we change [thing], then [metric] should improve because [reason]."
Copy Alternatives#
Provide 2-3 headline, CTA, or form-label alternatives when copy is a conversion blocker.
Context Updates#
List any reusable audience, objection, proof, or positioning discoveries that should be written to strategy/brand.md or content/ideas.md.
Supporting file: skills/growth-strategy/SKILL.md#
Growth Strategy#
Workspace Context#
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract#
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Growth strategy for compounding growth systems. Use this skill for growth loops, distribution bets, network effects, PLG strategy, and scaling decisions. Route tactical SEO, page/form CRO, and experiment design to the specialist skills.
Quick Reference#
| Situation | Use This Skill For |
|---|---|
| SEO, page CRO, or experiment execution | Route to specialist skills |
| Building growth engines | Growth Loops Framework |
| Strategic growth planning | Strategy & Frameworks |
| Distribution strategy | Channel & Platform Strategy |
| Network effects | Product-Led Growth |
Part 1: Core Principles#
Foundational Truths#
- Growth follows product-market fit, never precedes it
- Retention is the foundation; acquisition without retention is a leaky bucket
- The best growth is product-driven, not marketing-driven
- Compound effects beat linear efforts
- Every growth channel eventually saturates
- Network effects are the ultimate moat
- Premature growth destroys companies
Growth Is Not Marketing#
Growth is the systematic application of product, engineering, and data to create compounding user acquisition, activation, and retention. It's a mindset, not a department.
Part 2: Growth Loops Framework#
Why Loops, Not Funnels#
Funnels: Linear. Pour effort in, get results out, start over. Loops: Each cycle generates fuel for the next cycle.
The key shift: Move from "How do we get more users?" to "How does each user we acquire generate more users?"
Loop Types#
| Loop Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Content Loops | Users create content → attracts more users → more content |
| Viral Loops | Users invite others → exponential spread |
| Sales Loops | Customers generate revenue → fund more acquisition |
Critical Patterns#
| Pattern | Insight |
|---|---|
| Funnels vs Loops | Funnels are linear; loops compound |
| Paid ≠ Loop | Paid acquisition doesn't compound — it's buying users |
| Founder-Led First | Can't outsource finding growth model |
| Product Must Own Growth | Can't be marketing-only function |
| One Primary Loop | Others supplement but won't save you |
| Earned Over Paid | Invest 80%+ in earned/owned channels |
Platform Cycles#
New platforms open, then close. Time your bets correctly:
- Early: High reach, low competition
- Mid: Reach peaks, competition grows
- Late: High competition, diminishing returns
Part 3: SEO × SMO × CRO Framework#
SEO Checklist#
Page-Level
-
<title>— unique, 50-60 chars, primary keyword -
<meta name="description">— 150-160 chars -
<link rel="canonical">— self-referencing - Single
<h1>with primary keyword - Primary keyword in first 100 words
- Descriptive
alttext on all images - Internal links to related pages
Site-Level
-
robots.txtnot blocking important resources -
sitemap.xmlup to date - HTTPS everywhere; mobile-friendly
- Core Web Vitals passing (LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms)
OGP / Twitter Cards#
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:title" content="Page Title">
<meta property="og:description" content="Description">
<meta property="og:image" content="https://example.com/og-image.png">
<meta property="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image">CRO Core#
| Pillar | Goal | Key Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| SEO | Be found | Organic traffic, rankings |
| SMO | Be shared | Social CTR, shares |
| CRO | Convert | Signup rate, completion |
Part 4: Growth Models#
The LTV Equation#
LTV = (Average Revenue Per Customer × Average Customer Lifespan) - CACUnit Economics#
- LTV:CAC ratio: 3:1 minimum for sustainable growth
- Payback period: < 12 months preferred
- CAC: Cost to acquire a customer
- ARPU: Average revenue per user
AARRR Framework#
| Metric | Definition |
|---|---|
| Acquisition | Users come from |
| Activation | First meaningful use |
| Retention | Users come back |
| Referral | Users invite others |
| Revenue | Users pay |
Part 5: Network Effects#
Types of Network Effects#
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Direct | More users → more value (social networks) |
| Indirect | More users → more options → more value (marketplaces) |
| Two-sided | Supply and demand sides benefit (platforms) |
| Data | More data → better product → more users |
Building Network Effects#
- Cross-side presence: Ensure both sides of marketplace exist
- Liquidity thresholds: Hit critical mass in each segment
- Switching costs: Users invest in platform
- Platform stickiness: Integration with workflows
Part 6: Product-Led Growth (PLG)#
PLG Core Principles#
- Product as the main driver of acquisition
- Free trials and freemium models
- In-product virality
- Self-serve onboarding
- Usage-based expansion
PLG Metrics#
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Activation rate | > 40% |
| Time to value | < 5 minutes |
| Weekly active ratio | > 20% |
| Expansion revenue | > 20% of total |
Part 7: Growth Experimentation#
ICE Framework#
| Factor | Score (1-10) |
|---|---|
| Impact | Could this double growth? |
| Confidence | How sure will this work? |
| Ease | How easy to implement? |
Test Execution#
- Document hypothesis clearly
- Define primary and guardrail metrics
- Calculate required sample size
- Wait for statistical significance (95%)
- Run full business cycle (1-2 weeks minimum)
What NOT to Test#
- Button colors before understanding objections
- Copying competitors blindly
- Optimizing without funnel context
Part 8: Growth Team & Timing#
When to Hire Growth#
| Stage | Growth Focus |
|---|---|
| Pre-PMF | Founder-led, iterate on product |
| Finding PMF | First 100 customers, understand channels |
| Validated PMF | First growth hire, build experiments |
| Scaling | Full growth team, channel expansion |
Growth Team Structure#
- Individual Contributor: Run experiments
- Growth Manager: Prioritize and coordinate
- Growth Lead: Strategy and team management
Part 9: Key Frameworks Summary#
Andrew Chen's Wisdom#
- Marketplace dynamics
- Network effects as moat
- Platform distribution
- Cold start problem
Brian Balfour's Frameworks#
- Growth loops methodology
- Platform cycles
- Paid ≠ loop insight
Casey Winters' Playbooks#
- Kindle before fire (non-scalable → scalable)
- Product-led sales
- PQA > PQL
Common Mistakes#
- Premature scaling — Growth before PMF burns cash
- Acquisition without retention — Leaky bucket
- Chasing channels — Without understanding loops
- Vanity metrics — Focus on leading indicators
- One-hit wonders — Not building compounding systems
Related Skills#
- product-market-fit-analysis: For PMF assessment
- conversion-rate-optimization: For CRO implementation
- customer-success-and-retention: For retention strategy
- ab-test-setup: For growth experiments
Supporting file: skills/outbound-email-strategy/SKILL.md#
Outbound Email Strategy#
Workspace Context#
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract#
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Expert outbound email execution for B2B sales and business development. Build high-response cold outreach campaigns that feel personalized and drive conversations.
Quick Start#
- Define ICP — Who are you targeting and why?
- Research Prospects — Find personalization signals
- Craft the Hook — Lead with value, not a pitch
- Build Sequence — 5-7 touches across channels
- Handle Responses — Script for every outcome
ICP Framework#
Define Your Target#
| Element | Question | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Who decides? | VP of Engineering |
| Company | What type? | B2B SaaS, $1-10M ARR |
| Pain | What hurts? | Content isn't converting |
| Trigger | Why NOW? | Just raised funding |
| Proof | Why YOU? | Helped similar company get result |
Questions to Answer#
- What's their job title/role?
- What company size/type?
- What industry or vertical?
- What pain are they experiencing RIGHT NOW?
- Why should THEY specifically care?
Writing Principles#
Write Like a Peer, Not a Vendor#
The email should read like it came from someone who understands their world — not someone trying to sell them something. Use contractions. Read it aloud. If it sounds like marketing copy, rewrite it.
Every Sentence Must Earn Its Place#
Cold email is ruthlessly short. If a sentence doesn't move the reader toward replying, cut it.
Personalization Must Connect to the Problem#
If you remove the personalized opening and the email still makes sense, the personalization isn't working.
Lead with Their World, Not Yours#
"You/your" should dominate over "I/we." Don't open with who you are.
One Ask, Low Friction#
Interest-based CTAs ("Worth exploring?" / "Would this be useful?") beat meeting requests.
Subject Lines#
Short, boring, internal-looking. The subject line's only job is to get the email opened.
Rules:
- 2-4 words, lowercase, no punctuation
- Should look like it came from a colleague
- No product pitches, no urgency, no emojis
Examples:
- "reply rates"
- "hiring ops"
- "Q2 forecast"
Email Sequence Framework#
Sequence Types#
| Type | Duration | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Cold | 7 emails, 2 weeks | Standard outreach |
| Fast-Track | 5 emails, 1 week | Quick follow-up |
| Long-Play | 12-14 emails, 4-6 weeks | Enterprise/Nurture |
| Event-Based | 3-5 emails | Trigger-specific |
Sequence Flow#
| Day | Goal | Length | CTA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Introduction | 0 | Awareness + relevance | 50-100w | Soft ask |
| 2: Value Proof | 2 | Establish credibility | 75-125w | Meeting time |
| 3: Different Angle | 4 | Alternative pain point | 50-75w | Yes/no question |
| 4: Social Proof | 6 | Peer validation | 60-90w | Simple reply |
| 5: Resource Share | 8 | Give before asking | 40-60w | Soft |
| 6: Direct Ask | 10 | Be straightforward | 30-50w | Meeting request |
| 7: Breakup | 14 | Final attempt + opt-out | 25-40w | "Close your file?" |
Optimal Send Times#
Tue–Thu, 10–11 AM or 2–3 PM in recipient's timezone.
Personalization Framework#
4-Level System#
| Level | Time | What to Include |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Basic) | 30 sec | Name, company, industry |
| Tier 2 (Researched) | 2-3 min | News, LinkedIn content, job postings |
| Tier 3 (Deep) | 10-15 min | Podcast quotes, custom video, mutual connections |
Research Sources#
- LinkedIn posts and activity
- Company news/press releases
- Job postings (indicate priorities)
- Podcast appearances
- Conference presentations
- Mutual connections
Personalization Patterns#
Content-Based:
"Your post on X resonated — especially the point about Y."
Hiring Signal:
"Noticed you're hiring X — usually means Y pain."
Company News:
"Saw the news about X. Insight: Y."
Mutual Connection:
"X mentioned you're working on Y. Made me think of Z."
Message Components#
The Hook (First Line)#
Make it impossible to ignore. Prove you know them.
Good:
- "Saw your post about X — made me think of Y"
- "Noticed you're hiring X — usually means Y"
- "Your talk on X was Y"
Bad:
- "Hope this email finds you well"
- "I'm reaching out because..."
- "I came across your profile..."
The Observation#
Show you understand their world.
"Companies at your stage usually struggle with X" "Saw you're scaling — that usually creates Y"
The Value Offer#
Give before you ask.
- "Made you a quick audit"
- "Put together resource that might help"
- "Happy to share how we solved this for X"
The CTA#
Make it natural and low-friction.
Good:
- "Worth a look?"
- "Interested?"
- "Want me to send it over?"
Bad:
- "Let's book a 30-minute call"
- "When are you free to chat?"
Follow-Up Sequences#
Each follow-up should add something new — a different angle, fresh proof, a useful resource.
Follow-Up Templates#
Email 2 (Value Bump):
"Quick follow-up — additional insight. [Restate offer]."
Email 3 (Different Angle):
"New observation about their business. Thought this might be relevant."
Email 4 (Social Proof):
"Just helped similar company with result. Thought of you."
Email 5 (Break-Up):
"Closing the loop. If problem isn't a priority, no worries. Door's open."
Response Handling#
Classification & SLA#
| Response Type | Example | SLA | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | "Yes, let's talk" | 5 min | Book meeting |
| Curious | "Tell me more" | 1 hr | Send proof point |
| Objection | "Too small" | Same day | Handle with framework |
| Timing | "Not now, Q3" | Same day | Set reminder |
| Referral | "Talk to CFO" | 1 hr | Reach out to referral |
| Hard No | "Not interested" | 24 hr | Polite close |
Response Scripts#
Positive Response:
"Thanks! Here's what I promised. Quick question: [qualifying question]? If [condition], [next step]."
"Not Now" Response:
"No problem. Would it make sense to reconnect in [timeframe]?"
"What's This?" Response:
"In short: [1-sentence value]. [Reoffer value]. Worth a look?"
Skeptical Response:
"Fair to ask. [Proof point]. Happy to share case study if useful."
Cold Call Scripts#
Talk Track#
- Opener: Permission + value in one line
- Discovery: 3 questions (current flow, pain metric, priority)
- Value Hits: Match pain, cite proof, propose next step
- Objections: Acknowledge → brief proof → micro-commit
- Close: Time-bound CTA + send calendar while on call
Performance Benchmarks#
| Metric | Good | Great | Exceptional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Rate | 35-45% | 45-55% | 55%+ |
| Reply Rate | 3-8% | 8-15% | 15%+ |
| Meeting Booked | 1-3% | 3-6% | 6%+ |
High Reply Rate Signals#
- Personalized opening
- Clear value prop in first 2 sentences
- Similar-company social proof
- Low-friction CTA
- Clean plain-text formatting
A/B Testing Strategy#
Test Elements#
| Element | Test Approach |
|---|---|
| Subject lines | Question vs. Statement |
| First line | Hook types: signal vs. pain vs. question |
| CTA | Direct vs. soft vs. value offer |
| Timing | Morning vs. afternoon |
| Length | Short (50w) vs. medium (100w) |
Method#
Send 50/50 split to 100 prospects. Wait 48h, measure opens + replies. Winner goes to remaining list.
Volume Guidelines#
| Stage | Volume | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Testing (Week 1-2) | 20-50/day | Find what works |
| Scaling (Week 3-4) | 50-100/day | Systematize |
| Cruising (Month 2+) | 100+/day | Maintain and iterate |
Rule: Never sacrifice personalization for volume.
Compliance & Deliverability#
Authentication (Required)#
- SPF: Sender Policy Framework
- DKIM: DomainKeys Identified Mail
- DMARC: Domain-based Message Authentication
Spam Rate Thresholds#
- Hard ceiling: 0.3% complaint rate
- Target: <0.1% for reliable inbox
Best Practices#
- Keep sending identity stable
- Warm up new domains gradually
- One-click unsubscribe (List-Unsubscribe-Post)
- Follow CAN-SPAM requirements
Common Mistakes#
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Generic opener | "Hope you're well" ignored | Specific observation |
| Feature dump | They don't care yet | Lead with their pain |
| Multiple CTAs | Confusion | Single clear ask |
| Long emails | Won't be read | Under 75 words |
| Same angle each email | No reason to reply | New value per touch |
| No personalization | Feels like spam | Add research |
The Outbound Math#
Example:
- 100 emails/day × 5 days = 500 emails/week
- 5% response rate = 25 responses
- 50% positive = 12-13 interested
- 50% book calls = 6-7 calls/week
- 20% close = 1-2 customers/week
That's 4-8 customers/month from outbound.
Related Skills#
- lead-generation-and-demand (opens in a new tab) - Demand generation
- sales-and-revenue-operations (opens in a new tab) - Sales processes
- conversion-rate-optimization (opens in a new tab) - CRO frameworks
Supporting file: skills/sales-and-revenue-operations/SKILL.md#
Sales & Revenue Operations#
Workspace Context#
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: strategy/brand.md for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; about/me.md for personal voice; content/ideas.md and content/calendar.md for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md, and route durable learnings back to strategy/brand.md, about/me.md, or content/ideas.md.
Operating Contract#
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Full-stack sales playbook: founder-led sales, team building, enterprise deals, RevOps, ICP definition, buyer personas, and compensation design.
Quick Start#
- Assess stage — Founder-led, first reps, or scaling?
- Define motion — Inbound, outbound, PLG, or hybrid?
- Build ICP — Who are you selling to?
- Design process — Discovery → Demo → Close
- Instrument RevOps — Lead lifecycle, scoring, routing
ICP & Buyer Persona#
ICP Stack (build bottom-up)#
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ BUYING CENTER │ ← All decision stakeholders
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ USER PERSONA │ ← Daily user
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ BUYER PERSONA │ ← Signs the check
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ COMPANY PROFILE │ ← Firmographics
└─────────────────────────────┘Company Profile: industry/vertical, size (employees/revenue), stage, geography, tech stack
Buyer Persona: title/role, seniority, goals & KPIs, decision authority, what they care about
User Persona: daily workflow, pain points, tech savviness
Buying Center Roles: Champion, Economic Buyer, Technical Evaluator, End User, Blocker
ICP Scoring#
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Problem severity | 25% |
| Budget available | 20% |
| Champion identified | 15% |
| Technical fit | 15% |
| Decision timeline | 15% |
| Expansion potential | 10% |
The 50-Company Test#
List 50 specific companies that fit. Find the buyer's name at 20 of them. Reach out to 10. If you can't do this, your ICP isn't specific enough.
For full persona canvases, buying center maps, interview questions, and fit scoring: see references/full-guide.md
Founder-Led Sales#
Core principles:
- The founder IS the product — your credibility closes deals early competitors can't
- Your biggest competitor is indecision (40-60% of B2B purchases end in no decision)
- Sell before you build — Figma mockups can secure first customers
- Close the laptop — focus on diagnosis, not demos
- Book next meeting on the current one to maintain momentum
When to hire: Wait until ~$1M ARR and a repeatable process. Hire in pairs — you need an A/B test.
Hiring framework:
| Stage | Who to Hire | When |
|---|---|---|
| Founder-led | Nobody | Before $1M ARR |
| First AEs | 2 reps | After proven repeatability |
| SDRs | 1-2 | When inbound overflows |
| VP Sales | 1 | When 2+ reps hitting quota |
Enterprise Sales#
Buying committee roles: Champion (internal advocate), Economic Buyer (signs), Technical Buyer (evaluates), End User (uses daily), Blocker (can say no)
JOLT method for indecision:
- Judge level of indecision
- Offer a firm recommendation
- Limit exploration by building trust
- Take risk off the table — de-risk the deal
Key tactics:
- Identify and arm the champion — they sell internally for you
- Address FOMU (Fear Of Making a Mistake), not just FOMO
- Make procurement's job easy — prepare all documentation upfront
Sales Qualification#
BANT: Budget · Authority · Need · Timeline
MEDDIC: Metrics · Economic Buyer · Decision Criteria · Decision Process · Identify Pain · Champion
Rule: Qualify ruthlessly. "No" is a successful outcome. Disqualify on the first call if fit isn't there.
Sales Enablement#
Sales Deck (10-12 slides)#
- Current World Problem, 2. Cost of the Problem, 3. The Shift Happening, 4. Your Approach, 5. Product Walkthrough (3-4 workflows), 6. Proof Points, 7. Case Study, 8. Implementation, 9. ROI/Value, 10. Pricing Overview, 11. Next Steps/CTA
Demo Structure#
Opening (2 min) → Discovery Recap (3 min) → Solution Walkthrough (15-20 min) → Interaction → Close (5 min)
Objection Handling#
| Category | Response Approach |
|---|---|
| Price | ROI angle, payment terms |
| Timing | Urgency, cost of delay |
| Competition | Differentiation, unique value |
| Authority | Arm the champion |
| Status quo | Cost of inaction |
Revenue Operations#
Lead Lifecycle Stages#
| Stage | Owner | Entry Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Subscriber | Marketing | Opts in to content |
| Lead | Marketing | Basic info provided |
| MQL | Marketing | Fit + engagement threshold |
| SQL | Sales | Accepted, qualified via call |
| Opportunity | Sales AE | BANT confirmed |
| Customer | CS | Closed-won |
MQL = Fit Score (who they are) + Engagement Score (what they do). Neither alone qualifies.
MQL-to-SQL SLA: Contact within 4 hours; qualify or reject within 48 hours.
Lead Scoring#
Explicit (fit): Company size, industry, title, tech stack
Implicit (engagement): Pricing page visits, demo requests, email clicks, product usage
Negative: Competitor domains, student emails, unsubscribes
Lead Routing Methods#
| Method | Best For |
|---|---|
| Round-robin | Equal territories |
| Territory-based | Regional/vertical teams |
| Account-based | Named accounts / ABM |
| Skill-based | Complex deals, multi-product |
Speed-to-lead: Contact within 5 minutes = 21x more likely to qualify. After 30 minutes, conversion drops 10x.
For routing decision trees and automation playbooks: see references/routing-rules.md, references/automation-playbooks.md
Pipeline Stage Hygiene#
- Enforce required fields per stage to block advancement with bad data
- Flag stale deals (2x average time in stage) automatically
- Alert on stage skips (Qualified → Proposal without Discovery)
- Require reason codes on close date pushes
RevOps Metrics#
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Lead-to-MQL rate | 5-15% |
| MQL-to-SQL rate | 30-50% |
| SQL-to-Opportunity | 50-70% |
| Win rate | 20-30% |
| Speed-to-lead | <5 minutes |
| LTV:CAC ratio | 3:1 to 5:1 |
For scoring models and lifecycle definitions: see references/scoring-models.md, references/lifecycle-definitions.md
Sales Compensation#
Standard structure: 50% base / 50% variable (OTE). This is a starting point, not a law.
Modern comp plans align with customer outcomes, not just bookings. Reps who close churny deals should earn less than those who close sticky customers.
Ramp periods: 3-6 months for SMB, 6-12 months for enterprise. Provide guaranteed draw or reduced quotas during ramp.
Simplicity rule: If reps can't instantly calculate how an action affects their pay, the plan is too complex.
Common mistakes:
- Incentivizing only bookings without customer quality
- Over-complicated plans with too many variables
- No ramp protection for new hires
- Ignoring churn in comp design
For detailed comp frameworks: see references/guest-insights.md
Sales Metrics#
| Metric | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Win rate | Sales effectiveness |
| Sales cycle length | Process efficiency |
| Pipeline coverage | Forecast reliability (target 3-4x quota) |
| Lead-to-Opportunity | Qualification quality |
| CAC | Acquisition efficiency |
| Quota attainment | Rep performance |
Related Skills#
outbound-email-strategy— Cold outreachpricing-strategy— Pricing decisionsgo-to-market-strategy— Full launch planning
SHOWING THE FIRST PART OF 41.4 KB · THE FULL TEXT IS ON THIS PAGE
FAQ
07 QUESTIONS
01What is the Lead generation & demand agent skill?
Comprehensive B2B demand generation and lead acquisition skill. Use when building lead generation systems, creating demand acquisition campaigns, optimizing CAC, designing lead magnets, conducting lead research, or. It is listed under go-to-market in the 100xLab agent skills directory.
02How do I install Lead generation & demand in Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex?
Run npx skills add manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill lead-generation-and-demand in the project where you want it, then ask your agent for the skill by name. The --skill flag installs only Lead generation & demand, not every skill in the repository.
03What does the Lead generation & demand SKILL.md cover?
The SKILL.md includes sections on Workspace Context, Operating Contract, Quick Start, ICP Framework, Firmographics and Psychographics. Read the full text on this page or in plain markdown at /resources/agent-skills/manojbajaj95-claude-gtm-plugin--lead-generation-and-demand--1duiasj/raw.
04Which agents can use Lead generation & demand?
Lead generation & demand installs with the cross-agent skills installer (npx skills add), which sets it up for agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Each agent loads the SKILL.md when you ask for the skill by name.
05What license is Lead generation & demand under?
The manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin repository declares the MIT license. Read the license file in the repository before you copy or redistribute the skill.
06Is Lead generation & demand free to use?
Reading, copying and installing Lead generation & demand costs nothing: it is published in a public GitHub repository under the MIT license. Reuse and redistribution follow that license.
07Where is the source of Lead generation & demand?
Lead generation & demand comes from https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin, which has 67 GitHub stars. The SKILL.md is at https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin/blob/HEAD/skills/lead-generation-and-demand/SKILL.md. The author is manojbajaj95.
Need an agent workflow built around your stack?
Tell us the workflow you want automated. We reply within 4 working hours (IST).
ATTRIBUTION
Lead generation & demand was written by its original authors and is published in manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin (opens GitHub in a new tab) under the MIT license. All rights stay with the original authors.
100xLab did not write, maintain or endorse this skill. This page lists it for discovery. Repo stars belong to the source repository, not to the skill. Review any skill before you install it.