Programmatic SEO

Phase 0: Programmatic SEO Feasibility Index (Required)#

Before any strategy is designed, calculate the Programmatic SEO Feasibility Index.

Purpose#

The Feasibility Index answers one question:

Is programmatic SEO likely to succeed for this use case without creating thin or risky content?

---

🔢 Programmatic SEO Feasibility Index#

Total Score: 0–100#

This is a diagnostic score, not a vanity metric. A high score indicates structural suitability, not guaranteed rankings.

---

Scoring Categories & Weights#

---

Category Definitions & Scoring#

1. Search Pattern Validity (0–20)#

• Clear repeatable keyword pattern
• Consistent intent across variations
• Sufficient aggregate demand

Red flags: isolated keywords, forced permutations

---

2. Unique Value per Page (0–25)#

• Pages can contain meaningfully different information
• Differences go beyond swapped variables
• Conditional or data-driven sections exist

This is the single most important factor.

---

3. Data Availability & Quality (0–20)#

• Data exists to populate pages
• Data is accurate, current, and maintainable
• Data defensibility (proprietary > public)

---

4. Search Intent Alignment (0–15)#

• Pages fully satisfy intent (informational, local, comparison, etc.)
• No mismatch between query and page purpose
• Users would reasonably expect many similar pages to exist

---

5. Competitive Feasibility (0–10)#

• Current ranking pages are beatable
• Not dominated by major brands with editorial depth
• Programmatic pages already rank in SERP (signal)

---

6. Operational Sustainability (0–10)#

• Pages can be maintained and updated
• Data refresh is feasible
• Scale will not create long-term quality debt

---

Scoring Guidance per Category#

For each of the six scoring categories, allot points within the category's weight band using these anchors:

• 0–15% of band: No alignment — the site/topic clearly does not meet the criterion (e.g. fewer than 10 candidate entities for a directory-style PSEO).
• 16–40% of band: Partial alignment — the criterion is partially met, OR met for a small subset of pages only.
• 41–80% of band: Strong alignment — the criterion holds for most of the planned page set.
• 81–100% of band: Exemplary — the criterion holds universally and is reinforced by a structural data source (DB, API, validated CSV).

Sum the per-category scores to compute the Feasibility Index used in §"Feasibility Bands" below.

Feasibility Bands (Required)#

If the verdict is Do Not Proceed, stop and recommend alternatives.

---

Phase 1: Context & Opportunity Assessment#

(Only proceed if Feasibility Index ≥ 65)

1. Business Context#

• Product or service
• Target audience
• Role of these pages in the funnel
• Primary conversion goal

2. Search Opportunity#

• Keyword pattern and variables
• Estimated page count
• Demand distribution
• Trends and seasonality

3. Competitive Landscape#

• Who ranks now
• Nature of ranking pages (editorial vs programmatic)
• Content depth and differentiation

---

Core Principles (Non-Negotiable)#

1. Page-Level Justification#

Every page must be able to answer:

“Why does this page deserve to exist separately?”

If the answer is unclear, the page should not be indexed.

---

2. Data Defensibility Hierarchy#

1. Proprietary
2. Product-derived
3. User-generated
4. Licensed (exclusive)
5. Public (weakest)

Weaker data requires stronger editorial value.

---

3. URL & Architecture Discipline#

• Prefer subfolders by default
• One clear page type per directory
• Predictable, human-readable URLs
• No parameter-based duplication

---

4. Intent Completeness#

Each page must fully satisfy the intent behind its pattern:

• Informational
• Comparative
• Local
• Transactional

Partial answers at scale are high risk.

---

5. Quality at Scale#

Scaling pages does not lower the bar for quality.

100 excellent pages > 10,000 weak ones.

---

6. Penalty & Suppression Avoidance#

Avoid:

• Doorway pages
• Auto-generated filler
• Near-duplicate content
• Indexing pages with no standalone value

---

The 12 Programmatic SEO Playbooks#

(Strategic patterns, not guaranteed wins)

1. Templates
2. Curation
3. Conversions
4. Comparisons
5. Examples
6. Locations
7. Personas
8. Integrations
9. Glossary
10. Translations
11. Directories
12. Profiles

Only use playbooks supported by data + intent + feasibility score.

---

Phase 2: Page System Design#

1. Keyword Pattern Definition#

• Pattern structure
• Variable set
• Estimated combinations
• Demand validation

---

2. Data Model#

• Required fields
• Data sources
• Update frequency
• Missing-data handling

---

3. Template Specification#

• Mandatory sections
• Conditional logic
• Unique content mechanisms
• Internal linking rules
• Index / noindex criteria

---

Phase 3: Indexation & Scale Control#

Indexation Rules#

• Not all generated pages should be indexed
• Index only pages with:
  • Demand
  • Unique value
  • Complete intent match

Crawl Management#

• Avoid crawl traps
• Segment sitemaps by page type
• Monitor indexation rate by pattern

---

Quality Gates (Mandatory)#

Pre-Index Checklist#

• Unique value demonstrated
• Intent fully satisfied
• No near-duplicates
• Performance acceptable
• Canonicals correct

---

Kill Switch Criteria#

If triggered, halt indexing or roll back:

• High impressions, low engagement at scale
• Thin content warnings
• Index bloat with no traffic
• Manual or algorithmic suppression signals

---

Output Format (Required)#

Programmatic SEO Strategy#

Feasibility Index

• Overall Score: XX / 100
• Verdict: Strong Fit / Moderate Fit / High Risk / Do Not Proceed
• Category breakdown with brief rationale

Opportunity Summary

• Keyword pattern
• Estimated scale
• Competition overview

Page System Design

• URL pattern
• Data requirements
• Template outline
• Indexation rules

Risks & Mitigations

• Thin content risk
• Data quality risk
• Crawl/indexation risk

---

Related Skills#

• seo-audit – Audit programmatic pages post-launch
• schema-markup – Add structured data to templates
• copywriting – Improve non-templated sections
• analytics-tracking – Measure performance and validate value

When to Use#

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations#

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.